Thinning Practices in Southern Pines - With Pest Management Recommendations
T. Evan Nebeker – Respectively, professor, Department of Entomology,
John D. Hodges – Professor, Department of Forestry, Mississippi State University,
Mississippi State, MS,
Bob K. Karr – Assistant professor, Department of Forestry, Mississippi State University,
Mississippi State, MS, and
David M. Moehring – Professor (deceased), Department of Forestry, Mississippi State University,
Mississippi State, MS.
United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Technical Bulletin 1703, December 1985.
Management Recommendations to Reduce Losses
Minimizing Damaging Agents
Any thinning strategy must consider the potential hazards associated with
intensive silvicultural practices. The following management practices are
recommended to minimize the impact of damaging organisms and environmental
factors on pine stands.
Southern pine beetle. Southern pine beetle infestations are often
associated with poor tree vigor. Because tree vigor is basically related
to site, tree, stand, and environmental conditions, the development of southern
pine beetle outbreaks is strongly influenced by these conditions. Though
vigor is difficult to quantify, radial growth rate can serve as a strong
indicator of tree condition on vigor. Other factors that affect vigor
include age, stand density, species composition, soil texture, and type,
drainage patterns, and stand disturbances associated with cultural practices.
Poor tree vigor is usually associated with densely stocked stands and
declining or slow radial growth, conditions readily alleviated by thinnings,
especially those that remove the lower crown classes. These types of
thinnings eliminate the less vigorous or weakened trees that are the prime
targets of southern pine beetle attack. Reduced competition pressure
enhances the vigor of residual trees. Thinning stands back to 70 to 100
square feet/acre basal area reduces the risk of attacks and may also help to
slow spot growth if an attack does occur. For greater effectiveness,
thinning is generally timed in winter when the beetle is least active. Thinning to reduce southern |
 Thinning densely stocked stand to reduce threat of southern pine beetle. |
pine beetle hazard is recommended when basal area approaches 120 square feet/acre or when live crown ratios drop to about 40
percent. A carefully carried out thinning will stimulate radial growth,
reduce evapotranspiration, and increase rain throughfall. The reduction in
evapotranspiration slows down the exhaustion of groundwater supply and favors
continued diameter growth. The prevention of severe water stress results
in lower concentrations of monoterpenes and higher levels of resin acids, which
could be involved in making the stand less attractive to beetles (Hodges and
Lorio 1975).
Pine stands in low-lying areas are frequently subjected to flooding and
become attractive to southern pine beetle. In these areas, thinning alone
may not correct the problem. Additional management actions such as
drainage to divert excess water may be needed.
Any thinning strategy to reduce the risk of southern pine beetle attack
should be compatible with management goals and consider such things as site and
stand factors, equipment, seasonality, and product objective. Management
of other potential hazard (e.g., annosus root rot, Ips spp., and black
turpentine beetle) that might conflict with recommendations for southern pine
beetle must also enter into the decisonmaking process.
Annosus root rot. Thinning is the single most important factor
contributing to annosus root rot in pine stands, since cutting exposes stump
surfaces to infection. Damage due to the fungus increases with time after
thinning up to about 8 years, after which the damage level stabilizes.
Because annosus spore production is at its highest level in January and
February, thinning during the winter increases the likelihood of infection.
In addition to thinning, species susceptibility, virulence of the disease, deep
sandy soils, low soil organic matter, air temperatures below 70ºF, duration of
stump susceptibility, and pruning contribute to and/or facilitate infection.
A comprehensive survey of annosus root rot damage in planted and natural
stands throughout the South revealed that 2.8 and 0.07 percent, respectively,
were infected. In scattered high-hazard areas, the 5-year loss in volume
following thinning was estimated to be 20 percent of the stand (9 of 46
cords/acre). In general, volume loss following thinning ranges from 0.1 to
0.5 cord/acre/year (Alexander et al. 1981).
For high-harzard sites, the following measures are recommended for minimizing losses to annosus root rot (Kuhlman et al. 1976):
- Delay thinning or reduce the number of thinnings to reduce the risk of
loss. Wider spacing and reduced thinning are beneficial practices.
- Use borax on cut stumps for the most positive control. Borax is not
effective at a second thinning if not used for the first.
- Thin from April to August south of 34°N
latitude to provide passive control because of high air and stump temperatures
(which are lethal to disease spores) and low number of spores.
- Don't take any special precautions when
replanting previously infected sites. The disease does not persist in
the soil.
- Plant more resistant species on high-hazard
sites, e.g., longleaf pine is more resistant than loblolly pine.
|
 Treating stump with borax to control annosus root rot. |
There is some evidence that prescribed burning
will reduce the severity of annosus root rot in thinned plantations (Froelich et
al. 1978). On low-hazard sites, chemical treatment of the stumps is of
doubtful value (Hodges 1974). It is generally believed that on sites rated
low hazard for annosus root rot, no restrictions on thinning are necessary.
Although the best strategy for reducing the disease on high-hazard sites may be
to delay or do no thinning, stands on low-hazard sites may be thinned based on
normal silvicultural prescriptions dictated by product objectives, biological
constraints, and desired capital recovery. As recommended above, stumps on
high-hazard sites should be treated with borax and, in stands with confirmed
root rot, Peniophora gigantea (Fr.) Massee, a saprophytic fungus, and,
when possible, thinning should be done during the hottest months of the year
(May-August) to take advantage of high temperatures and low spore production and
survival conditions. Prescribed burning may be done before and after
thinning to further insure the protection of residual stands from infection.
If spacing is wider than 8 by 8 feet, and the
product objective is pulpwood, thinning may be foregone, particularly on
high-hazard sites. Chemical thinning should be done for precommercial
thinning on high-hazard sites.
Because thinning to reduce the hazard of
southern pine beetle incidence conflicts with management recommendations for
annosus root rot, foresters should be aware of the tradeoffs in areas where both
pests are likely to occur. Benefits must be weighed against potential
losses for any chosen thinning strategy. In most cases, thinning should be
done in the winter to reduce the hazard of southern pine beetle infestation, and
the stumps should be treated with borax to prevent annosus infection.
Fusiform rust. Losses due to fusiform rust
have been estimated to exceed $25 million annually in value, making it the most
economically damaging disease of southern pines. Slash and loblolly pines
are the preferred hosts, slash pine being the more seriously affected. The
disease is more severe in plantations than in natural stands, with mortality
occurring primarily in the seedling stage.
Interestingly enough, cultural practices that
favor fast growth of stands increase the incidence of fusiform rust.
However, to prescribe against cultural practices that improve growth is not
silvicultually and economically sound. It has been claimed that even a
50-percent rust infection rate in a stand can be offset by an increase in volume
resulting from such intensive cultural practices as site preparation and
fertilization.
Thinning has little or no practical value of
reducing the incidence of fusiform rust because infection occurs at the early
stages of stand development. It must, therefore, be practiced for a
different purpose – to minimize losses due to rust, i.e., salvage. The
first 5 years after planting are the critial period. Precommercial
thinning may not be justified and may aggravate the problem by increasing the
surface area for infection and by preventing natural pruning. This
implication is supported by the finding that close spacing reduces fusiform rust
incidence. Heavy thinning may also have an adverse effect by favoring the
growth of alternate hosts (oaks), thereby enhancing rust incidence.
Thinning of heavily infected stands, on the other hand, can profoundly affect
total wood production if heavily infected trees certain to die before final
harvest are removed. If rust incidence is less than 25 percent, the first
thinning should remove the majority of the diseased trees. Opening up the
stand too much can have unfavorable consequences on the residual stand in terms
of growth and damage from ice and wind.
 Stand with rust-infected trees before sanitation salvage to remove severely infected trees. |
 Stand with rust-infected trees after sanitation salvage to remove severely infected trees. |
Wind/windthrow. Wind and windthrow are
natural phenomena that cause extensive damage to southern pine stands. The
severity of damage depends on geographic location, wind gustiness, and other
factors.
In a number of studies, thinning influenced the
amount of damage due to wind and windthrow. The heavier the thinning, the
greater the wind damage. More crown damage (limbs and small branches
broken off, needles and bark whipped off) occurred in heavily thinned stands.
Although thinning in general increases wind and windthrow damage, it can
potentially reduce such damage by removing diseased, high-risk trees.
Because bigger trees are more prone to windthrow, an early thinning will improve
the stability of stands after the remaining trees have adapted to greater
exposure.
The formulation of a thinning strategy within
the Coastal Plain hurricane belt should take into account the possibility of
windthrow damage. The following considerations could help in developing an
optimum thinning strategy:
- Trees infected with annosus root rot and
fusiform rust are prone to wind damage.
- Shallow root systems favor windthrow.
- Edge trees are more stable than interior
trees.
- Trees on soils extensively saturated with
water are prone to windthrow.
- Stand density and height alter the wind
profiles.
- Wind is funneled through gaps and saddles in
main ridges, resulting in greater wind acceleration.
- Indentations in the edge of stands,
especially V-shaped openings, produce a funneling effect.
- Logging injuries contribute to windthrow.
- Windfall losses are heavy following partial
cutting.
Ice/glaze. Slash, longleaf, and loblolly
pines are generally more susceptible than shortleaf pine to glaze damage.
Glaze damage can be very serious, depending on species, geographic location, age
of trees, amount of ice formed on trees, stand density, presence of disease,
crown characteristics, and diameter/height ratio. Thinning has very
profound effects in modifying the degree of glaze damage. Studies have
shown that increasing thinning intensity causes increasing amounts of glaze
damage.
Glaze damage can be minimized by early
manipulation of the growing space (precommercial thinning) to develop trees with
sturdy, compact crowns. Adequate stocking must be maintained to provide
mutual support among trees (Brender and Romancier 1965; Lemon 1961). In
ice storm belts, loblolly should be thinned lightly (no more than one-third of
basal area at a time) and more frequently (from below or selectively). If
selective thinning is not feasible nor practical, row thinning at wider intervals
(say every eighth or tenth row) with selective thinning within leave rows would
be a desirable alternative (Shepard 1975). Selective thinning should
remove the smaller, weaker trees. Bent trees should be pruned (Williston
1974).
Minimizing Felling Injuries
The following practices are suggested to limit
damage to pines resulting from felling:
- Thin in winter and late summer because trees are more severely injured during spring and early summer. (See #7 below.)
- Continue to salvage high-risk trees after each cutting (or target for next thinning) to reduce infection courts.
- Mark leave trees, instead of those to be cut, because this calls attention to the crop trees.
- Use directional felling wherever possible.
- Use smaller machines to minimize unacceptable damage to residual trees.
- Establish stands at wider spacings to reduce thinning frequency.
- Because damage is reduced where there is frozen soil and snow cover and little sap flow, thin at the end of autumn and the beginning of winter, the best months in more northerly areas.
- Time operations so as to avoid wet weather logging to minimize stand productivity losses associated with soil compaction (Moehring and Rawls 1970).
Minimizing Skidding Injuries
Skidding-related damage can be reduced by adhering to the following practices:
- On clay soils or soils saturated with
moisture use skidding equipment that minimizes soil compaction; otherwise
schedule skidding during dry weather (Moehring and Rawls 1970).
- In stands that will tolerate little damage,
consider using horses for skidding logs.
- Cut logs short enough to minimize scarring of
residual trees during forwarding operations.
- Avoid damage to low-lying areas with fine
textured soils by shifting logging operations to better-drained, sandy soils
during wet periods (Hatchell et al. 1970).
- Use smaller equipment to reduce the impact on
soils and residual trees where the trails are dispersed. With larger
equipment, it would be better to concentrate the impact on as few trails as
possible because heavy equipment affects the soil to a greater extent during
the first few trips.
- Use cultural techniques such as ripping for
rehabilitating damaged areas.
- Hasten site recovery by loosening,
revegetating, or mulching the disturbed area.
It has been suggested that 40 years are required
for natural forces to bring soil conditions in loblolly pine stands of the
southeastern United States back to normal (Hatchell and Ralston 1971).
With regard to ameliorative conditions and restoration, the presence of logging
residues after delimbing contributes to the prevention of significant compaction
(King and Haines 1979). Disking, ripping, and subsoiling also ameliorate
compacted soil conditions (Hatchell et al. 1970; Moehring 1970; Peters 1977).
Bedding (or a moderate amount of fertilizer) has
been shown to improve growth of loblolly pine on compacted soils with a greater
growth response obtained than on uncompacted soil. This has been
attributed to elimination of competing vegetation by skidding (Hatchell 1981).
Other biotic factors important in natural recovery of compacted soil include
increased percolation rates and noncapillary pore space attributable to
deep-rooted species like kudzu and alfalfa (Uhland 1950).
Dense layers of herbage aid in preventing soil
compaction, just as does slash placed on the skid roads and over areas of
heavier traffic. Increased herbage also reduces the amount of erosion,
rain impact, vehicle impact, and high soil temperatures resulting from direct
solar radiation.
[ Contents ]
[ Previous ]
[ Next ]
[ Home ]
|